Latest Articles

Final Analysis: Measuring Online Marketing Impact

Marketers are constantly looking for increased value from their campaigns and the Web offers them better targeting of customers and improved measurement of impact. May 2009 sees the eMetrics Marketing Optimization Summit come to London and New Media Knowledge caught up with the summit’s founder.

more

Business Brief: Job Hunting in the Web 2.0 World

The way applicants apply for jobs is changing fast as Web-based content replaces the traditional paper CV. New Media Knowledge spoke to an online recruiter looking to make the job search and hiring process far more intuitive using Web 2.0 tools.

more

New Year’s Evolution: What Does 2009 Hold for New Media?

The digital media sector has been one of the few bright lights in wider economic gloom. With mixed messages as to the level of investment in online marketing next year, New Media Knowledge spoke to various sector players to gauge their thoughts.

more

• Search Party: Interview with Kevin Ryan
• Break for the Borders
• Business Briefing: How to Sell on the Web
• ‘Mega Monday’ Bucks High Street Woes
• Measure for Measure: Meeting the Analytics Challenge
• Straight from the Horsesmouth
• North and South: The UK Digital Media Divide

Related Articles

• Stakeholder Risk Info Needs Analysis

  Communications are often the weakest link in the risk management process. But a stakeholder risk information needs analysis can help, explains David Hillson... more

• Risk Metalanguage & Risk Responses

  In order to understand a risk fully it is helpful to identify its causes as well as its effects. We can do this by using risk metalanguage to develop risk responses saysd David Hillson... more

• No Such Thing As A Zero-Risk Project

  The word "risk" is a common and widely-used part of today's vocabulary, relating to personal circumstances, society, and business. Likewise with projects. Try to establish a zero-risk project and you'd have to cancel the project before you even started it, explains David Hillson.... more

• Personal Risk Management

  Personal risk management is among the broad range of activities to which we can apply the general principles and lessons of risk management, and New Year can be a great time to do it, explains David Hillson... more

• Risk & Finding Opportunities

  Describing risk as "uncertainty that matters" allows for different types of consequences. There are two primary types of risk: threats and opportunities. So how do we identify and maximise the latter, asks David Hillson... more

Creativity & Risk Management

The view that project management's tenets of processes and risk management are the antithesis of innovation needs challenging, says David Hillson...

The view that project management's tenets of processes and risk management are the antithesis of innovation needs challenging...

By David Hillson

[Register and post your own comments on this article below...]

A project management magazine recently contained an article on innovation which was somewhat provocative when it stated that “Project management is about processes and risk management, and that’s the absolute antithesis of innovation.” This challenge to risk management deserves a response!

The purpose of risk management in projects and business is to seek out significant uncertainties and address them proactively. It is most effective when it considers both threats and opportunities, as recommended by most best-practice guidelines. Surely achieving this goal requires a great deal of innovation?

Risk identification's creative techniques

The first area where creativity is essential is in risk identification. This requires thinking the unthinkable, not being constrained by “the Plan”, but considering other options and alternatives. It asks questions such as “What if… Why not… If only… How about…?”

Potential problems (threats) and unexpected benefits (opportunities) can be identified using a range of creative techniques, including brainstorming, assumptions-busting, root-cause analysis, visualisation, scenario analysis, or futures thinking. Indeed it is probably not possible to identify risks without being innovative and thinking new thoughts.

Innovative side to developing risk reponses

But a second part of the risk process also requires fresh thinking, namely development of effective risk responses. Einstein reputedly said “It is not possible to solve a problem using the same thinking that created it.” Just identifying risks is not enough, and if appropriate action is not taken then risk exposure will remain unchanged. However deciding what is “appropriate” for each risk demands a degree of innovation, being prepared to consider and implement actions which were previously not thought necessary.

Einstein also defined insanity as “Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”, which might be rephrased as “If you always do what you always did, you’ll always get what you’ve always got!” As the Chinese proverb says, “If we don’t change direction we’re likely to end up where we’re headed.”

Creative risk management steps up

It seems likely that the person who wrote that “risk management [is] the absolute antithesis of innovation” was probably reacting to an outdated caricature of risk management.

If the aim of risk management is perceived as preventing variation from plan at all costs, desperately clinging to the original approach and refusing all change, then it is true that creativity and innovation will be stifled. But modern risk management is very different. It actively embraces and welcomes change, recognising that some risks present an opportunity to improve on the original plan by working “smarter, faster, cheaper” – there is upside as well as downside.

“Uncreative risk management” is an oxymoron which cannot exist, and risk management without innovation merely rehearses and records the inevitable. To be effective the risk process must embody innovative and creative thinking in both risk identification and response development, proactively seeking potentially significant uncertainties and addressing them appropriately. Anything less does not deserve to be called risk management.

About the Author:
© October 2005, Dr David Hillson PMP FAPM. Dr Hillson is Director of Risk Doctor & Partners. To provide feedback on this Briefing Note, or for more details on how to develop effective risk management, contact the Risk Doctor (david@risk-doctor.com), or visit the Risk Doctor website www.risk-doctor.com