Search Marketing Myths: Reality Check!
Search marketing is such an obscure art to most that myths around it grow and ciurculate unchallenged. The hype stops here, insists i-level's Amanda Jones, as she shines a light on 7 common myths currently doing the rounds...
Search marketing is such an obscure art to most people that
the myths around it grow and circulate largely unchallenged. The
hype stops here, as we shine a light on 7 common myths currently
doing the rounds...
By Amanda Jones
[Register and post your own comments
on this article below...]
MYTH: Search doesn’t have a role to play in brand
advertising
MOSTLY FALSE: It’s true that you can’t build a brand
solely using Search Engine Marketing. In an ideal Search Engine
Marketer’s world, all consumer would use search engines to look
for specific brands and products that they have heard of and
want to buy. Wouldn’t our campaign conversion rates stay
consistently high and our ROI healthy? The reality, however, is
that people tend not to know what they are looking for when they
start out: we see this in the searches they make and in campaign
response and conversion rates. The role of Search is to put a
brand in front of a captive audience, to make them aware of it,
to give them the opportunity to learn more about a brand and
hopefully shift perception. Search can ensure that a brand stays
in a consumer’s consideration set from the research stage right
through to purchase. So yes, Search absolutely has a branding
role to play.
MYTH: If Natural Search is free why would I bother with Pay
per Click (or Paid Placement)?
There are two myths to dispell here: firstly, natural
search – or the practice of achieving natural search - doesn’t
come without a price tag. Even if you have SEO expertise
in-house you will need to pay for this resource to design,
re-design or optimise your website in a search engine-friendly
way. Secondly, targeting the natural search results and not the
paid-for would be to run half a campaign or ignore up to half of
the opportunity (while on Google around 70% of the traffic is
derived from the natural search results, on other engines this
percentage share is closer to fifty). Put another way, why would
you do PR and not advertising, or vice versa? And besides,
paying ten pence (or sometimes less) for a highly qualified lead
is hardly considered a poor investment. So go on, bother with
both!
MYTH: “Organic search is much more powerful than paid search.
And with Word of Mouth responsible for something like 80% of all
purchasing decisions, no-one trusts ads any longer” (Justin
Kirby, MD of DMC)
PART TRUTH: Justin is right: word of mouth and organic
search are both a powerful thing and coincidentally feed off one
another. Take “Googling” as an example: you hear an industry
rumour in the pub one evening, next day you head straight for
Google to see the rumour is circulating the world wide web. And
on Google, the organic results are the more popular and often
the more powerful set of listings in terms of conversion. But on
other engines fewer people realise the difference between what’s
advertising and what’s organic. On Yahoo!, for example, some of
the perceived “organic” results as paid for through their paid
inclusion programme. Research shows that consumers increasingly
care less whether the listings are influence by advertising
dollars. What they are looking for are relevant and appealing
results – it’s often easier to make a paid listing look more
appealing and targeted than a natural result. Search is still a
non-intrusive media paid-search works. So if it aint broke, why
try and fix it?
MYTH: Search is best handled separately from the rest of my
media mix
FALSE: Search is integral to consumers’ media
consumption, so why should Search Marketing be silo’d off?
Search needs to be planned alongside TV, Press Radio, PR – any
advertising that is creating interest and awareness in your
brand or product. Digitally, there are many synergies,
Affiliates and Search being one – both strategies can benefit
from combined planning, implementation and learnings. And
looking beyond media, Search informs and is informed by website
design, customer experience and usability. Search therefore
needs to be at the heart of the Marcoms mix.
MYTH: Pay per Click Search is becoming an increasingly cost
prohibitive medium
For some smaller advertisers this could be true,
particularly those operating in fiercely competitive sectors
such as Finance or Travel. But lest we forget why we’re all here
in Search: we are talking about low risk, low hanging fruit! As
long as you offer a competitive price and product, and a clear
path to purchase, the outcome will be a low acquisition cost and
a potentially high lifetime value per customer. Time too for a
reality check: when was the last time you benchmarked your
Search cost per new customer against your TV ROI (if indeed you
can measure such a tangible return)?
MYTH: High, natural rankings can be guaranteed if you know
what you’re doing in SEO
FALSE: Even if you have great SEO expertise to hand,
success cannot be guaranteed. There are too many external
factors involved, not to mention the fact that very few people
on this planet know Google’s (and MSN, Yahoo! and the other
algorythic engines) recipe for ranking, which is, in any case,
in constant flux. Advertisers should be wary of any SEO or SEM
firm that guarantees high rankings (for “guaranteed” read
“underhand SEO techniques” or “paid placement”). As with any
supplier or agency, ensure you understand their methodology and
are reassured that their approach is ethical. Even when you’re
in safe, expert hands, SEO is a two-way street and the best
results are achieved when SEO is integrated into a website’s
ongoing development strategy. Ensure you therefore allocate the
necessary resource to SEO, and you’ll be on your way to success
in no time.
MYTH: Google is by far and away the most important search
engine, delivering the volume that I need
That may well be – today. But if we look to the US market
we’ve seen Google’s market share decline, as Yahoo!, MSN and Ask
Jeeves, to name only the top tier engines, have invested heavily
in their products. Not just from a usage perspective but from an
advertiser one, 2006 will bring more buying points into the
Search market. It’s the old addage: don’t put all of your eggs
in one basket. Plus, there’s no such thing in business as
achieving the volume that you need. Don’t you want more
customers?!
----------------
About the Author
© of Amanda Jones, Head Of Search,
i-level, a
£10m business handling the full range of Paid-for and Natural
Visibility disciplines in one place. Amanda's online life
began in 1998 (when Google’s was born) at 24/7 Europe, global
digital advertising sales network and technology provider.
Working in London and then at their European headquarters in
Amsterdam, Amanda was responsible for the coordination and
implementation of pan-European advertising campaigns on client
websites. Before joining i-level, Amanda was Head of Search at
digital marketing agency Outrider, one of the pioneers of Search
Engine Marketing services since 1995. At i-level her current
client portfolio includes: Orange, Yell.com, Interflora, COI
Communications, Specsavers, Starwood and Gillette.
EVENT: New Directions In Search - 8 September 2005
Amanda is speaking on trends and developments in UK search at
the NMK event
New Directions In Search
Comments
You must be logged in to comment.