Video Accessible On 2.5G Mobiles!
There's a danger the MMS market will go nowhere in its current manifestation. Mobile content companies shouldn't just focus on 3G to fulfil and stimulate demand, Graham Jarvis explains...
There's a danger that the MMS market will go nowhere in
its current manifestation. Mobile content companies should not
just focus on 3G to fulfil and stimulate demand, ... because
yes, you can access video on your 2.5G mobile phone!
By Graham Jarvis
[Register and
post your own comments on this article below...]
Stephen
Kendall-Lane, Chairman of Kendall Wood International, thinks
that the real opportunities for MMS and video on your mobile lie
within the existing 2.5G mobile phone market because there are
currently around 1.5 billion mobiles in use. At least 80% of
these are GSM users - most of whom, he says, will eventually
have to upgrade to GPRS.
Its third generation cousin - 3G - doesn’t quite yet hit such a
scale, and so an opportunity could be lost if mobile content
companies and networks don’t exploit such a large potential
market.
It emerges that there is much scepticism about MMS and
particularly about the application of video on 2.5G phones.
However, Kendall-Lane’s technology proves that you can have
quite high quality video clips on even a bog standard GPRS
phone. It may not be a broadband experience, but it works
well.
How does 2.5G MMS work?
If your phone runs on the Symbian platform - 60% of GPRS
mobiles do - Kendall-Lane can send you video via MMS. Otherwise
it's still possible to send you – the end-user - information
about the video clip you are downloading, or even additional
information, while it's in the process of doing so. What you
in fact get is an instant slideshow-like experience, helping to
keep you sufficiently interested while the downloading process
is completed. You then get a short video clip of, say, a movie
you’d like to watch or even other footage.
Part of the key to making video work on MMS compatible mobile
phones comes down to the compression ratios. Kendall-Lane says
that the H264 compression standard is “infinitely more
superior”, and that better compression is vital if video on 2.5G
is to become popular. If your phone runs on the Symbian
platform, you will then be able to achieve an instant viewing
experience on 2.5G. In fact, Kendall-Lane claims that it is
possible to send up to 75 seconds of video to an end-user by
MMS.
Potential lies closer to home than you think
So the big question is: if video is possible on an 2.5G, why is
everyone negating it for 3G? The market potential is so much
bigger with 2.5G phones, and there are high growth markets like
India and China ready for it and in the waiting. Hang on though,
there’s potential in Europe too! Some independent research,
according to Kendall-Lane, shows that the EU market has around
60 million Smartphone end-users, and a third of those are likely
to access video content at a rate of around 60 clips per
year.
Most of the research focused on the 3G market, but it
demonstrates the potential for the 2.5G market. It also shows
where things aren’t quite working. For a number of reasons 40%
of those interviewed had not accessed video. Of those who did
access video on their 3G phones, around 11% never access video
again because of a poor video experience.
All of this needs to change; MMS is said to be the most
important mobile application, but Kendall-Lane also claims that
we’re only just at the beginning of the mobile revolution. This
is why the technical hassles of downloading content to a phone
have to be taken out of the process. End-users want an instant,
trouble-free experience. This includes informing customers about
the price, size and expected duration of a download, enabling
the end-user to make an informed choice. When this is not done,
customers are lost. If the download time is lengthy, then it is
important to give them something to watch in the interim.
Industry strategies for bringing consumers in
If the future lies in being able to deliver to the mass market,
not the top 10% or 20% but to 80% of end-users, then it's
vital for the industry to overcome its core problems,
particularly its cynicism about the video on 2.5G phones – and
they need to develop a pricing framework which allows content
providers to receive a viable share of the price charged to
end-users. Only then will creative content emerge to attract the
customer.
Rather than frightening off end-users by always charging them
for the cost of downloads, the customer should be able to
receive video via MMS without charge. If you give them a taster
of the experience for free straight to the phone, then they
should also have the opportunity to download more video content
from a server and pay for it. The content could also be
sponsored, reducing the price to the end-user.
The whole interaction between end-user and content provider
should be permission-based. Too much damage to the industry has
been caused by those sending out unsolicited messages for which
customers have no choice but to pay for what they receive, even
though it may be unwelcomed. So permission-based marketing is
vital, and it establishes a benchmark for ensuring that
customers only pay for what they wish to access and
receive.
Content providers and the mobile phone network operators
therefore need to ask: what do customers really want? At the end
of the day it is about Customer Relationship Management: using
technology in the right way to deliver what the customer really,
really wants. If a customer wants to receive video content to
their mobile phone as a message, then the mobile networks should
ensure that this happens, and they should not leave the customer
to suffer the hassle of downloading content.
After all, I'm told, they don’t own their customers to
quite the extent they’d like to. Even so it doesn’t just have to
be about the delivery of video content via MMS. The important
message though is that it should be easy to access, at the right
price, with the right method of fulfilment and instantly. MMS is
the perfect vehicle for such content as this, because it gets
over the end-users fear of downloading.
Copyright of Graham Jarvis, 2005
About the Author:
Graham Jarvis is Editor and Return on Investment Spokesman of
the Chartered Institute of Marketing’s Technology group’s
e-newsletter (
www.cimtech.org/newsletter). CIMTech argues
that Return on Investment-based marketing should be the driver
of all implementations of new technology. With an MA in Online
Journalism, Graham is also former Guest Editor for BT
www.insightexec.com, contributing consultant
for Sift’s Customer Management Community on Insightexec.com, and
media services consultant for companies like SiteMorse.com,
Makemyshow.com, the Firm Group, Intellectual Capital Development
Ltd (ICDL) and others. A member of the Chartered Institute of
Marketing and the Chartered Institute of Journalists, his
research specialisms include: technology, sales, marketing and
legislative compliance, website accessibility, data protection,
Freedom of Information, risk management and value creation,
search engine optimisation (in relation to accessibility
issues), call & contact centre management, outsourcing,
marketing research management, CRM, multimedia messaging
services & technology, internet security, and VOIP.
CIMTech International –
http://www.cimtech.org/newsletter
Graham's blog:
http://www.media-insert.co.uk
Comments
You must be logged in to comment.